The BMW buttons touchscreen argument has been going on for years. Now BMW’s own executive just settled it — at least from the company’s side. Vikram Pawah, CEO of BMW Group Australia, told CarExpert that drivers under 45 prefer touch and voice controls over physical knobs and switches. Buttons are losing because young people don’t want them.
That’s the official explanation. Cost savings didn’t come up once.
What Pawah Said Word for Word
“We can see that voice and touch are becoming more and more common,” Pawah told CarExpert. “Maybe it’s a generational thing as well. You would see that a lot of the younger generation, maybe 45 or below, they’re tapped into these technologies at a faster pace, using voice, using touch.”
He kept going. Younger buyers aren’t just tech-savvy — they’re impatient. “They want things done quickly, and they’re multitasking,” Pawah said. “And we have to keep that in mind. That’s how customers are evolving. They are multitasking.”
Read that again. A BMW executive just said drivers are multitasking behind the wheel and BMW needs to design around that. Road safety researchers have spent decades proving how dangerous distracted driving is. Nobody at CarExpert pressed Pawah on it. He moved straight to the bigger picture.
Pawah took the explanation further. “I think you need to understand why that change is happening, and once you understand that it’s easier to comprehend what will happen in the future as well,” he said. “A car is not a stand-alone piece. It’s part of what’s happening around you in society.” A car company CEO just used civilization-level language to explain why your heating dial now lives three menu screens deep. That happened.
What the BMW Buttons Touchscreen Reality Looks Like Today
Walk into a new BMW iX3 and the BMW buttons touchscreen shift hits you immediately. Climate controls are gone from the dashboard and buried in the center screen. Most other functions live there too. A small cluster of physical buttons survived in the center console. Window switches held on — still on the doors for now.
The Neue Klasse platform arriving in BMW’s next model generation goes further. Early previews show even fewer physical controls than anything BMW currently sells. The most button-free BMW lineup in the brand’s history hasn’t arrived yet. It’s still coming.
One physical volume knob still exists in current models. It’s one of the last things standing in the BMW buttons touchscreen war. Whether it survives into Neue Klasse hasn’t been confirmed.
The Reason Pawah Didn’t Mention
Every physical button in a car needs its own engineering, tooling, testing and assembly process. A touchscreen replaces hundreds of those individual components with one piece of glass running software. The manufacturing cost difference between a button-filled cabin and a screen-first one is real and it runs into serious money across a full production run.
The BMW buttons touchscreen shift saves BMW money. Pawah’s CarExpert interview didn’t mention that once. He gave younger buyers full credit for a design direction that also happens to reduce what BMW spends building each car. Both things can be true — young buyers may genuinely prefer screens and BMW may also save money removing buttons. Presenting only the customer preference side while staying silent on the financial side is a choice worth noticing.
Physical Buttons Are Actually Better for Driving — The Research Says So
The BMW buttons touchscreen debate isn’t about nostalgia. It’s about how human beings actually operate a vehicle while moving through traffic.
A driver who knows where the temperature knob sits reaches for it without looking. Muscle memory handles it. Eyes stay forward. Adjusting fan speed, skipping a song, turning on heated seats — experienced drivers do all of this without a single glance away from the road when physical controls are available.
A touchscreen requires looking every time. Find the right menu. Locate the correct icon. Press accurately on a flat glass surface with no tactile feedback. Every one of those steps takes eyes off traffic. Research on driver distraction consistently shows touchscreen interactions take longer and create more visual distraction than equivalent physical control operations.
Pawah said younger buyers multitask and want things done quickly. Physical buttons are faster to use while driving than touchscreens. The BMW buttons touchscreen direction makes the most common cabin adjustments slower and more dangerous — not faster and easier. The argument that screens serve multitasking drivers better than buttons does not hold up against what the research actually shows.
The 45-Year-Old Number Nobody Questioned
Pawah drew a specific line. Under 45 prefers touch and voice. Over 45 presumably prefers buttons. BMW designs for the under-45 group.
BMW’s customer base has historically skewed older. The people buying new BMWs have generally been in their 40s, 50s and beyond — not in their late 20s. If under-45 buyers are genuinely driving the BMW buttons touchscreen direction then either BMW’s customer demographic is shifting significantly younger — major commercial news worth stating openly — or preference data is being used selectively to justify decisions with other drivers behind them.
No research was shared alongside Pawah’s claim. The 45-year-old figure appeared without data. That doesn’t make it wrong. It means nobody outside BMW can check it. When a cost-reducing design change gets attributed entirely to customer preference without supporting evidence the gap between those two things deserves attention.
BMW Isn’t Alone — But It’s Going Further Than Most
Tesla built its cabin around a single screen from day one. Rivian did the same. Newer brands entering the market default to screen-heavy interiors because software is cheaper than hardware at production scale.
Mazda and Mercedes-Benz have both pushed more functions onto screens in recent years. Neither has committed to the BMW buttons touchscreen direction as fully as Neue Klasse appears to be heading.
The difference with BMW is what the brand built its reputation on. iDrive evolved into one of the most intuitive control systems in any car. Physical buttons were clearly labeled and logically grouped. Experienced BMW drivers knew their cabin without looking. Neue Klasse trades that identity for a screen-first approach that puts BMW closer to Tesla than to the driver-focused brand it spent decades being.
BMW Buttons Touchscreen — Physical vs Digital
| Physical Buttons | Touchscreen Controls |
|---|---|
| No eyes off road for familiar controls | Puts hundreds of functions behind one screen |
| Works by feel and muscle memory | Easier to update through software |
| Works with gloves in cold weather | Cleaner interior appearance |
| No menu navigation required | Lower manufacturing cost |
| Faster to use while driving | Consistent with phone and tablet habits |
| Rarely crash or freeze | Can be updated remotely after purchase |
Frequently Asked Questions
Why is BMW removing physical buttons?
BMW Group Australia CEO Vikram Pawah says the BMW buttons touchscreen shift reflects younger buyers’ preferences. Drivers under 45 prefer touch and voice controls according to Pawah. No supporting research was published alongside the claim. Manufacturing cost reduction through replacing physical components with software is a significant factor that went unmentioned in the interview.
What exactly did the BMW executive say?
Pawah told CarExpert that buyers under 45 are “tapped into these technologies at a faster pace” and prefer voice and touch. He described younger customers as people who want things done quickly because they multitask — a comment with clear road safety implications that went unchallenged during the interview.
Which BMW models show the BMW buttons touchscreen shift most clearly?
The new iX3 already puts most functions behind the center touchscreen. The Neue Klasse platform arriving in upcoming BMW models takes the BMW buttons touchscreen direction further — expected to be the most screen-dependent BMW lineup the brand has ever produced.
Are other car brands doing the same thing?
Tesla and Rivian built their interiors around screens from the start. Mazda and Mercedes-Benz have moved more functions to touchscreens in recent years. BMW’s Neue Klasse commitment to the BMW buttons touchscreen direction appears to go further than most established premium brands currently have.
Are touchscreens actually safer than physical buttons?
No. Driver distraction research consistently shows touchscreen interactions take longer and require more visual attention than physical control operations. The BMW buttons touchscreen shift makes common driving adjustments harder to complete without looking away from traffic — the opposite of what road safety research recommends.
What is the Neue Klasse platform?
BMW’s next major vehicle platform arriving in upcoming models. Early previews show further reduction in physical controls compared to current BMW vehicles. Neue Klasse represents the fullest expression of the BMW buttons touchscreen direction BMW has committed to.
Did BMW mention cost savings as a reason for removing buttons?
No. Pawah’s CarExpert interview attributed the BMW buttons touchscreen shift entirely to younger buyer preferences. Manufacturing cost reduction through replacing physical components with software — a significant financial benefit to BMW — was not mentioned during the interview.
Vikram Pawah’s CarExpert interview gave younger buyers full responsibility for a design direction that also reduces what BMW spends on every car it builds. The BMW buttons touchscreen shift may genuinely reflect what under-45 drivers want. It also saves BMW serious money. Pawah mentioned one of those two things. The other one sits in the background of every cabin that used to have buttons and now has a screen. Buyers choosing between a BMW and a competitor with more physical controls will settle this debate more honestly than any executive interview can.
Also Read: New Mitsubishi Montero Debuts September 2 — Iconic Gauges Return and Land Cruiser Size Confirmed
